Posts: 1608 |
dee Posted Wed 23 May, 2007 11:31 PM |
what kinda meanie is gonna give less than 5 stars?
well, while everything is all shiney and new at least... |
|
|
Posts: 1443 |
harry potter Posted Wed 23 May, 2007 11:51 PM |
dee wrote: what kinda meanie is gonna give less than 5 stars?
well, while everything is all shiney and new at least...
*lost*
what's a "photo ranking" when it's @ home 'la? |
|
|
Posts: 1681 |
champagnesupernova Posted Wed 23 May, 2007 11:56 PM |
harry potter wrote: dee wrote: what kinda meanie is gonna give less than 5 stars?
well, while everything is all shiney and new at least...
*lost*
what's a "photo ranking" when it's @ home 'la?
Seconded. |
|
|
Posts: 1608 |
dee Posted Thu 24 May, 2007 12:02 AM |
| if you go to the archive section and go through the photos you can give each picture an out of five star rating. |
|
|
Posts: 1443 |
harry potter Posted Thu 24 May, 2007 12:04 AM |
dee wrote: if you go to the archive section and go through the photos you can give each picture an out of five star rating.
well, all of you are a 6-out-of-5 in my book
|
|
|
Posts: 2545 |
SamuraiSandy Posted Thu 24 May, 2007 12:07 AM |
oh...too cheesy!
harry potter wrote: dee wrote: if you go to the archive section and go through the photos you can give each picture an out of five star rating.
well, all of you are a 6-out-of-5 in my book
|
|
|
